RAVINDRA S/O. LAXMAPPA TELI v. KUMAR SACHIN S/O. LAXMAPPA TELI
RSA/100142/2019 · 2025-09-02
G Basavaraja
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37578 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37578 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11157 RSA No. 100142 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100142 OF 2019 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
1.
RAVINDRA S/O. LAXMAPPA TELI, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. INGALAGI, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313.
2.
SMT. SUDHA W/O. SHASAPPA TAVANIDHI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. KULAHALLI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587311.
3.
SMT. SHAILA W/O. SADAPPA MELLIGERI, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. INGALAGI, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587313. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
KUMAR SACHIN S/O. LAXMAPPA TELI, AGE: 16 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY M/G.
NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL MOTHER SMT. YALLAWWA W/O. LAXMAPPA TELI, I.E RESPONDENT NO.2.
2.
SMT YALLAWWA W/O. LAXMAPPA TELI, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.09.04 12:47:13 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11157 RSA No. 100142 of 2019
R/O. INGALAGI, TQ:MUDHOL, DIST:BAGALKOT.
3.
LAXMAPPA S/O. HANAMAPPA TELI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. INGALAGI, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.H. PATIL, ADVOCATE AND SMT. NIRMALA B.G., ADVOCATES FOR R1 AND R2;
NOTICE SERVED TO R3)
THIS RSA FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 28.08.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.14/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT, SITTING AT JAMKHANDI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.01.2015, PASSED IN O.S. NO.72/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MUDHOL, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA)
Learned counsel for appellants files memo of withdrawal, in which it is stated as under :
“It is submitted that the appellants have filed the above appeal challenging the Judgment and Decree passed in R.A.No.14/2015 and O.S.No.72/2011, both the parties are compromised the matter but because of
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11157 RSA No. 100142 of 2019
pendency of the above appeal, they are unable to present the same. Hence the appellants to wish to withdraw the above appeal. Hence this memo.”
2. In view of memo, appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal.
3. In view of disposal of appeal, pending I.As’, if any are also disposed of.
4. Office is directed to send a copy of this order along with trial Court records to the concerned Court.
Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE ckk LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 6