[2025:RJ-JP:41544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12718/2025 Hansraj S/o Harphool, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Adalwada Kalan, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-Addl.GA cum PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 44/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown, Sawai Madhopur wherein he was charged for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949 and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused person namely Ashok Kumar has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.02.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2236/2025. Counsel submits that all the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since the date of [2025:RJ-JP:41544] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12718/2025] his arrest and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that indulgence of bail has already been granted to the co-accused person namely Ashok Kumar and also looking to the fact that petitioner is in custody since of the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Hansraj S/o Harphool arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/107