HARSH SHRIVASTAV @ RANU PANDIT S/O SHRI RATAN SHRIVASTAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14661/2025 · 2025-11-12
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37574 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37574 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45492] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14661/2025 Harsh Shrivastav @ Ranu Pandit S/o Shri Ratan Shrivastav, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mehandi-Baag, Hanuman Mandir Ke Peeche, P.s. Kotwali, District Alwar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 12/11/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.54/2025 registered at Police Station Arawali Vihar, District-Alwar for offences under Section 304(2) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The accused-petitioner is of tender age of 21 years. He further submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he had snatched a mobile phone. He submits that though there are 13 cases pending against the accused-petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since 28.08.2025. Charge-sheet has
[2025:RJ-JP:45492] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14661/2025] been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Harsh Shrivastav @ Ranu Pandit S/o Shri Ratan Shrivastav be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Arawali Vihar District Alwar in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to
[2025:RJ-JP:45492] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14661/2025] immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/254