2025:HHC:41470 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 16520 of 2025 Decided on : 03.12.2025 Yadvinder …Petitioner Versus Additional District & Session Judge, Family Court, Nalagarh …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Anupam Anzranni Mehta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “A. Pass an Order[S] / Directions[S] to Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalagarh, to expedite the matter and decide it as soon as possible in interest of Justice. B. Pass an Order[S] / Directions[S] Principal Judge, Family Court to give shortest next dates as possible to decide the matter effectively and expeditiously. i.e. 1 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:41470 week date. C. Pass an Order[S] / Directions[S] Principal Judge, Family Court to decide the Application for recalling of order Dated 15/03/2021, filled by the Respondent, whereby the respondent was proceeded ex parte, as soon as possible. D. Pass an Order[S] / Directions[S] to Principal Judge, Family Court to conclude all the Evidences as soon as possible in interest of justice. E. Pass an Order[S] / Directions[S] to Principal Judge, Family Court to fix the schedule to fix dates for the Evidences of Petitioner and Respondent so that Both parties shall arrange as per dates fixed by the Learned Family Court and conclude it as soon as possible. F. Pass an Order[S] / Directions [S] to Principal Judge, Family Court, not to give unnecessary adjournments and in case the trial court finds any party misusing the liberty, then Learned Trial Court shall impose the cost and any other effective action. G. Pass an Order [S] / Directions[S] to Principal Judge, Family Court to Decide the matter within 2 months in the interest of Justice.” 2. The grievance of the petitioner primarily is with 3 2025:HHC:41470 regard to the non-adjudication of the matter pending before the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalagarh. 3. Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Radhey Shyam and another versus Chhabi Nath and others, (2015) 5 Supreme Court Cases 423, along-with connected matter, has been pleased to hold that judicial orders or acts are not amenable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. In light of the said pronouncement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the present petition is dismissed. The petitioner may independently approach the Court on the cause agitated by way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 03, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)