\\ J IN THE HIQH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28954 OF 2014 Between: 1. S.C.Narasimha Reddy & Co. Rep. by its Managing partner S.Krishna Arjun Reddy, S/o. S.C.Narasimha Reddy, aged 45 years, R/o. Proddatur, YSR District 2. K.V.Contructions, Rep. by its partner K.V.Ramana Reddy, S/o. Siddha Reddy, Proddatur, YSR District. 3. B.Balachenna Reddy, S/o. Chenna Reddy, Occ: Contractor, R/o. 3-105, Prakash Nagar, Proddatur, YSR District. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. The Proddatur Municipality, Proddutur, YSR District. Rep. by its Commissioner 2. The Commissioner and Director of Municipal, Administration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 1st respondent municipality in canceling the tenders vide resolution No.32, dated 2.8.2014 for execution of the various works in pursuant to the e-procurement Tender Notice No.98 to 130/2013-14/E 1 dated 22.2.2014 issued by the 1st respondent and inviting the fresh e-procurement tender Notice No.62 to 90/2014-15/El, dated 08.09.2014 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to accept the tenders filed by the petitioners in pursuant to the tender notice 98 to 130/2013-14/El, dated 22.2.2014 in the interest of justice. LA. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 36229 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to the e- procurement tender Notice No.62 to 90/2014-15/El, dated 08.09.2014 issued by the 1st respondent Municipality pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SR P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI JANARDHANA RAO KATTA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following; ORDER APHC010647712014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28954 OF 2014 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) S.C.Narasimha Reddy & Co., and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Proddatur Municipality and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.PNAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.JANARDHANA RAO KATTA 2.GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No. 28954 of 2014 ORDER: 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners represented that in the light of the subsequent developments and changed circumstances, the cause in the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, if any, are therefore dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. JANARDHANA RAO KATTA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three C.D.Copies nm HIGH COURT NM DATED: 18/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.28954of2014 0i>- I 01 APR 2025 g ^ . Curreni aecuon . DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS