Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37570 (CHH)

PAWAN AGRWAL v. Enforcement Directorate

WP227/689/2021 · 2025-03-21

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:13714 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 689 of 2021 1 - Pawan Agrwal S/o Shri Ram Kumar Aged About 50 Years R/o Pyarelal Agrawal Marg, Ramsagar Para, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ashok Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Ram Kumar Agrawal Aged About 53 Years R/o Pyarelal Agrawal Marg, Ramsagar Para, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Enforcement Directorate Through- Assistant Director, Pmla Enforcement Directorate, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sunil Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Premchand Agrawal, R/o M-52, Rajeev Nagar Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vimal Agrawal, S/o Shri Vishvanath Agrawal, R/o M-52, Rajeev Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Vinod Agrawal, S/o Lt. Dhanlal Agrawal, R/o Behind Mahaveen School, Gudhiyari, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Alok Agrawal S/o Lt. Nemichand Agrawal, R/o Village- Kharora, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Rajesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Agrawal, Relationship Manager, Union Bank of India, Pandri Branch, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - C. Adinarayan, S/o Shri C.H.S. Naidu, Union Bank of India, Ramsagarpara Brance, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 8 - Indrani Ghosh, S/o S.C. Ghosh, Union Bank of India, Pandri, Branch- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 9 - Anoop Kumar Das, S/o Lt. B.N. Das, Union Bank of India, Ramsagarpara Branch, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms Palak Dwivedi, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Saurabh Dangi, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Dr. Saurabh Pande, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21.03.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM