- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3430 WP No. 100922 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100922 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI. RAMAPPA S/O. SHIVAPPA TALLUR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WORKING AS DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR KKRTC, BALLARI 1ST DEPOT, BALLARI DIVISION, DIST. BALLARI- 583101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAVI HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/ DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, KKRTC, BALLARI DIVISION. BALLARI- 583101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASHANT HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO A) ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 09.01.2025, NUMBER. KA. KA.SAA.BA.VI. SHISHTU. 03/ 2025/ 1658/ 2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER BACK INTO SERVICE WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS, BY FIXING OUTER LIMIT, AND B) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE INCLUDING COST, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3430 WP No. 100922 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The challenge in the case at hand is to the order of suspension. 2. During the subsistence of the subject petition, the learned counsel Sri.Prashant Hosmani representing the respondent-Corporation submit that the order of suspension has been revoked and the petitioner is directed to report to duties to a different place. 3. Owing to the subsistence of the present petition, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner has not joined to the said place. 4. In the light of the revocation of suspension, nothing survives for further consideration in the case at hand. Therefore, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. 5. In the event, the petitioner has delayed in joining to the transferred place, no precipitative action - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3430 WP No. 100922 of 2025 should be taken against him, as the petition is pending consideration at the hands of this Court. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 183