Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37567 (MAD)

S.VASUDEVAN v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/10946/2025 · 2025-04-22

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.10946 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.10946 of 2025 1. S.Vasudevan 2. S.Raja 3. B.Santhosh Kumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Kelambakkam Police Station, Pallikaranai. Crime No.219 of 2024. 2. P.Kalimuthu ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to the Crime No.219/2024 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as far as the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For Respondents For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10946 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.219 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, registered for the offences under Sections 296(b), 118(2), 353(3) of BNS. 2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner and the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card and it is made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10946 of 2025 guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the FIR in Crime No.219 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent. 5. In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No.219 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees five thousand only) jointly as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Madras High Court, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 22.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.10946 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. rts To 1. The Inspector of Police, Kelambakkam Police Station, Pallikaranai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Crl.O.P.No.10946 of 2025 22.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis