2025:JHHC:36675-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No.327 of 2025 ------ Taffazul Hussain (aged about 68 years) son of Late Ramjan Mian, Resident of village-Amnari, P.O.-Silwar, P.S-Sadar (Mufassil), District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand) …. …. Respondent no.4/Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O.-Hazaribagh, P.S.-Sadar, District-Hazaribagh. 2. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribagh, P.O.-Hazaribagh, P.S.-Sadar, District-Hazaribagh. 3. Circle Officer, Sadar Circle, Hazaribagh, P.O.-Hazaribagh, P.S.- Sadar, District-Hazaribagh. ..... .... Respondents/Respondents 4. Jagmohan Prasad, son of late Bhola Mahto, Resident of village- Rola, P.O.-Rola, P.S.-Hazaribagh (Mufassil), District-Hazaribagh. ..... .... Petitioner/Respondent With L.P.A. No.253 of 2025 ------ Tafjul Hussain (aged about 68 years) son of Late Ramjan Mian, Resident of village-Amnari, P.O.-Manari, P.S-Sadar (Mufassil), District-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) …. …. Appellant/Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Ranchi, Project Building PO & PS- Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, PO, PS Hazaribagh, Dist-Hazaribagh 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Hazaribagh, PO, PS Hazaribagh, Dist-Hazaribagh 4. The Circle Officer, Sadar, Hazaribagh, PO-Hazaribagh, PS & Dist- Hazaribagh ..... .... Respondents/Respondents 5. Jagmohan Prasad s/o Late Bhola Mahto, Resident of village-Rola, P.O. Rola, P.S. Hazaribag (Mufassil), District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 6. Badal Agarwal s/o Lakshmi Kant Agarwal, Resident of 95A, 2025:JHHC:36675-DB 2 Boddom Bazaar, K.B. Marg, P.O. Hazaribag, P.S. Sadar, Near Khajanchi Talab, District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 7. Harendra Kumar s/o Mahadev Ram, Resident of village-Rola, P.O. Rola, P.S. Hazaribag (Mufassil), District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 8. Abdul Latif s/o Akbar Miyan, Resident of Amnari, P.O. Jagrnathdham, P.S. Hazariabg (Mufassil), District Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 9. Inderdeo Prasad s/o Moti Mahto, Resident of Silwaar, Khurd, P.O. Jagrnathdham, P.S. Hazariabg (Mufassil), District Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 10. Keshar Lal s/o Late Kuldip Sahay, Resident of village-Rola, P.O. Rola, P.S. Hazaribag (Mufassil), District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 11. Gautam Govinda Sanehy s/o Late Punit Mahto, Resident of village-Rola, P.O. Rola, P.S. Hazaribag (Muffasil), District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 12. Manohar Prasad s/o Anandi Mahto, Resident of village-Rola, P.O. Rola, P.S. Hazaribag (Mufassil), District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 13. Sukhdeo Prasad s/o Gopal Ram Mahto, Resident of village- Rola, P.O. Rola, P.S. Hazaribag (Mufassil), District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand) ….. …… Newly Added Parties/Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Advocate (In both the appeals) For the State : Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG-IA Mr. Yogesh Modi, AC to AAG-IA For Pvt. Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate (In LPA Nos.327/2025 & 253/2025) For Resp. No.10 : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Bankim Prasad, Advocate (In LPA No.253/2025) ------ 04/Dated: 08.12.2025 I.A. No.6190 of 2025 in L.P.A. No.327 of 2025 1. This interlocutory application has been preferred under Section 2025:JHHC:36675-DB 3 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 291 days in preferring the instant appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Considering the sufficient cause as has been referred in the interlocutory application, the delay of 291 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned. 4. Accordingly, I.A. No.6190 of 2025 stands allowed. L.P.A. No.327 of 2025 and L.P.A. No.253 of 2025 5. Learned counsel for the appellant, in both the appeals, after some argument, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw these appeals with a liberty to ventilate his grievance before the appropriate forum for getting the declaration over the title of the disputed land in question by raising all the points. 6. Considering the same, the instant appeals stand disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. 7. In consequence thereof, pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 08.12.2025 Rohit/- Uploaded on 09.12.2025