Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040007212025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/208/2025 Joram Nagu and 3 Ors Son of Joram Tazing, presently serving as Under Secretary, Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Bate Koyu Age: Occupation : Son of Late Kobom Koyu presently serving as Deputy Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 3: Nima Tondrang Age: Occupation : Son of Late O Tondrang presently serving as Joint Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 4: Debashis Dey Age: Occupation : Son of Late J K Dey presently serving as Private Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Secretary (Personnel) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Secretary (Finance) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 5:The Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Itanaga Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Tagum, Rup Techi Tara,Hage Tai,Likha Tabin,Rage Koyu Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 07-08-2026 Heard Mr. R. Koyu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh appearing for the respondents. Page No.# 3/3 The petitioner in the present writ petition has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities to release to him his salaries for the periods he was placed under suspension vide order dated 29-10-2022. The petitioner had remained under suspension w.e.f. 29-10- 2022 to 09-11-2023, where-after, in pursuance to a direction passed by this Court vide judgment and order dated 09-11-2023 in W.P.(C) No. 389/2023, the petitioner was reinstated in his service. After the reinstatement of the petitioner in his service, a Departmental Proceeding not having been instituted against the petitioner, the petitioner had instituted the present writ petition. Mr. S. Tapin, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh, on instruction, has submitted that the salary for the period of suspension undergone by the petitioner has already been computed and released to him after deducting the subsistence allowance drawn by him in the matter, Mr. Koyu, learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said position. In view of the fact that the relief prayed by the petitioner in the present writ petition having already been granted to him no live issue remains for adjudication. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed on being rendered infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant