OGIREDDY SUDHAKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/470/2025 · 2025-01-28
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3756 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3756 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(qTsT``` iE IN THE HIGH COURTQF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMA TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUA TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE i fpNRUE:ENNUT:WENTY FIVE t \ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA RED CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 470 OF 2025 Between : i9 tgiv ogireddy sudhakar Reddy, s/o. o.Krishna Reddy Aged about 42 years, occ Business R/o. D.No.13-294, Gangalamma Gudi Veedhl', Kotturu Village, Anaparthi MandaI, East Godavari Dl-strict -533342. ...PetI-tI-Oner/Accused No.2 AND
1. The State ofAndhra pradesh, Through SHO, PS Biccavole, Rep.by l'ts AddI. Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature at Amaravathi For the state of Andhra pradesh.
2. GollapaIIj Ramakrishna, s/o. Manganna, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Kapavaram village, Bl'ccavole MandaI, East Godavarl- District, A.P. ...Respondents/ De-facto complainant petition under section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is filed prayI'ng that in the cl'rcumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticjpatory Ba" to the petitl'oner/Accused No.2 in connection to crime in FIR No.275/2024 of PS BI'CCaVOIe; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds of crI-ml-nal petl-lion and upon hearing the
arguments of Sri K.Gani Reddy, Advocate for the petl'tjoner and publI.C Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1 ;
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 470 of 2025
ORDER: The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioner/A2 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.275/2024 of Biccavole Police Station, East Godavari District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and others for the offences punishable under Sections 132, 221, 308(5) r/w 3(5) B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 29.12.2024, the V.R.O. of Kapavaram Village of Biccavole Mandal got information that red gravel was being dug and on that the I'nfOrmant, Who Was working aS V.R.A. of Kapavaram Village of Biccavole Mandal, observed Ac.1.23 cents of land in survey No.32-1B, they found one X200 JOB machine there and that red gravel was dug for 15 feet deep in the land, and on enquiry, driver of the JOB machine Rajesh, s/o. Naga Satyanarayana informed that the JOB belongs to A.1 and the petitioner/A.2. As they were not able to take the JOB to police station, the VRO kept the informant to guard the same and to see that no diggings take place. On 30.12.2024, at about 3.00 PM, A.1, the petitioner/A.2 and the driver Rajesh tried to dig the gravel again, the informant informed that VRO informed that there are no permissions to dig gravel in that place and \-. 2 f/ that he was kept there to guard the same. on that, the sal-d three persons came to him with stl'cks and threatened to kI'll hl-m, pushed him aside and took the JOB machine forcl'bly. Hence, the report. 4. Heard. perusedtherecord. 5. A perusal of the material ava"able on record goes to showthat the petl'tioner, along wl'th other accused, l's alleged to have beaten the I'nformant and took away the JOB whl'ch was being guarded by the I'nformant.
Merely because the JCB, whl'ch l's belongl'ng to the petjtIOner, was taken away by the accused, prJ-ma fac,e, there I-S any amount of ambiguity whether the offences alleged would be made out or not ln v,-ew of the same, thI'S Court js l'ncll'ned to conslder the prayer of the petjtl-oner/A2 for grant of antl-cipatory bal'l. 6 Accordingly, l'n the event of his arrest wl'th regard to thl's cr,'me, petjtIOner/A2 sha" be released on ball on hl's executlng a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), wlth two suretles each for the ll'ke sum to the sat,sfactl'on of the arrestlng poll'ce officlals and also on condI'tiOn that the petitioner sha" make hl'mself avaI'Iable for l'nvestigatl'on as and when requlred and that he sha" not cause any threat, I-nducement or proml'se to the prosecutl'on wl-tnesses. •~ -s& E=
The petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m, and 05.00 p.m., till filing of the charge-sheet. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. sD/-N.NAGAMMA EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN E=i!-N6RI: sE6:Ti For/ To,
1. The Station House Officer, Police Station Biccavole, East Godavari District. 2. One CC to Sri. K.Gani Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two cos to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT]
4. One spare copy OFFICER
I/
HI'GH COURT SRK,J DATED:28/01 /2025
ORDER CRLP.No.470 of 2025 ALLOWED # \ ,,ARANI 1% -`` *o=. `ha 1€.,,,. €