Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37558 (PNJ)

PAWAN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRWP/2925/2025 · 2025-03-26

Alok Jain, Lisa Gill

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2925-2025 Date of Decision: March 26, 2025 PAWAN .....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Senior DAG, Haryana. **** LISA GILL, J. 1. Grievance raised by petitioner is that application dated 27.02.2025 submitted on his behalf seeking parole is not being decided and in fact it has been orally conveyed that application stands rejected. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Senior DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent – State. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner addresses a limited prayer for final decision of application dated 27.02.2025, seeking parole. 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer addressed, this petition is disposed of with a direction to competent authority to decide application dated 27.02.2025 (Annexure P1) submitted on behalf of petitioner for parole, by passing a speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, an application has not been received, as RITU SHARMA 2025.04.01 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2925-2025 -2- is the apprehension raised by learned counsel for State, present petition be treated as an application for parole on behalf of petitioner. Copy of decision be conveyed to petitioner. 6. There is no expression of opinion on merits of the matter. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) March 26, 2025 JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.04.01 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document