SUBHASH CHANDRA RUHELA S/O JEETA RAM RUHELA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17140/2025 · 2025-11-14
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37555 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37555 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46022] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17140/2025 Subhash Chandra Ruhela S/o Jeeta Ram Ruhela, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Bairas, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Kasawali, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the Impugned order dated 22.09.2025 (Annex.1) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Govt. Sr. Secondary
School,
Kasawali,
Sikar. iii) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour
of
the
petitioner.”
[2025:RJ-JP:46022] (2 of 2) [CW-17140/2025]
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation on basis of grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /124