RESFUL SHEKH ALIAS RESHFUL SK ALIAS RESFUL SHEKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/1579/2025 · 2025-12-23
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37553 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37553 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:38660-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 1579 of 2025
Resful Shekh @ Reshful Sk @ Resful Shekh, S/o Late Rahman Shekh, R/o Village Kankarbona, P.O. & P.S.- Pakur (Mufassil), District- Pakur ... … Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... … Respondent
--------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
---------
For the Appellant : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv. Mr. Birat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sinha, Adv. For the State
: Spl. P.P.
---------
02/23.12.2025 Heard Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl. P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.11.2025 passed in B.P. No. 340 of 2025, arising out of Pakur (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 155/2023, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that while the informant was taking rest along with others the accused persons had arrived in search of him and co-accused Ajamul Shekh had thrown a bomb in the house of the informant as a result of which the informant and others have sustained injuries. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the main allegation of throwing a bomb has been attributed to Ajamul Shekh and so far as the appellant is concerned, the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It has further been submitted that in similar circumstances one of the co- accused namely, Lakhfor Sk @ Jahiruddin has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:38660-DB ) Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 311 of 2024. Learned counsel adds that the appellant is in custody since 08.08.2025. Learned Spl. P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. On consideration of the fact that the main allegation is attributed to Ajamul Shekh and in similar circumstances one of the co-accused having been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court as noted above, we while setting aside the order dated 07.11.2025 passed in B.P. No. 340 of 2025, arising out of Pakur (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 155/2023, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 155/2023. This appeal stands allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Dated, the 23rd December, 2025 A. Sanga/- Uploaded on 23.12.2025
-2-