HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU RP No.21/2025 in WP(C) No.2808/2024 Healthium Medtech Ltd. ….Petitioner/Non-applicant(s) Through :- None V/s Union Territory of J&K and others ….Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. S.SAhmed, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Raina, Advocate for respondent No.6/review petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 08.07.2025 1 By this petition, the applicant herein is seeking review/correction of clerical/typographical errors that have crept in paragraphs 32, 33, 35, 37, 40, 48 and 57 of the judgment dated 02.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No.2808/2024. 2 Learned counsel for the review petitioner states in para 32 of the judgment (supra), it has been erroneously recorded that “in the year 2010, respondent No.6 i.e. review petitioner had challenged the allotment of tender to respondent No.5”, whereas, in fact, it was M/s Centenial Surgical Suture Limited, which had challenged the allotment of tender to respondent No.5 in the year 2010. It is stated that wherever reference is made to the litigation filed in the year 2010, the name “M/s Centenial Surgical Suture Limited” ought to be read in place of “respondent No.6 (S. R. Technomed)”. It is further pointed out that in paragraph No.40 of the judgment, it has inadvertently been recorded that “The domination of a single entity, M/s Johnson and Johnson Pvt. Ltd along with S.R.Technomed since 1999 till date has had severe negative consequences Serial No.130 2 including higher prices and reduced innovation”. However, the factual position is that it was only M/s Johnson and Johnson Pvt. Ltd., who had been supplying the suture materials since 1999, and not S.R.Technomed. Therefore, the reference to S.R.Technomed in the said sentence is erroneous and is liable to be deleted. 3 For the reasons stated in the application and there being no objection from the learned counsel for the non-applicants/respondents No. 1 to 4, it is allowed. 4 Accordingly, it is ordered that in paragraph Nos.32, 33, 35, 37, 48 and 57 of the judgment dated 02.06.2025, wherever reference is made to the writ petition filed in the year 2010 by “respondent No.6 (S.R.Technomed)”, the same shall be read as “M/s Centenial Surgical Suture Limited”. Further, in line No.11 of paragraph No.40 of the said judgment, “M/s Johnson and Johnson Pvt. Ltd. along with S.R.Technomed” shall be read as “M/s Johnson and Johnson Pvt. Ltd.”, and the name of S.R.Technomed shall stand deleted. 4 This order shall be read in conjunction with judgment dated 02.06.2025, to the extent of the above corrections. Disposed of accordingly. Jammu: 08.07.2025 Sanjeev ) (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge