Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37548 (BOM)

RESHMA PANDURANG SUTAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/1605/2022 · 2025-04-22

Shri S M Modak, Shri Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 21-WP-1605-22.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1605 OF 2022 Reshma Pandurang Sutar .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Vaibhav Sugdare a/w Shraddha Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner. • Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2025 P.C. : 1. In this Petition, there are various prayers made. However, the prayer clause D refers to ‘B’ summary report dated 12/05/2021 in respect of the C.R. No.484/2020 registered at Vairag Police Station, u/s 354 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The matter is pending before the learned Magistrate who has not yet considered whether to accept or reject the B summary report. If the summary report is not accepted, the Magistrate is empowered to direct further investigation. Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2025.04.25 17:08:12 +0530 2 / 2 21-WP-1605-22.odt 3. Therefore, at this stage, we are not inclined to entertain this Petition. All the questions raised, are left open to be agitated before the learned Magistrate by the Petitioner while opposing grant of summary report. 4. With these observations, the Petition is disposed of. (S. M. MODAK J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)