Dimple Vs. Rajnish Chadha & Ors. CMP(M) No. 698/2024 18.12.2025 Present: Mr. Vasu Sood, Advocate, for the appellant. Respondent No. 1 ex parte. Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 & 3. CMP(M) No. 698/2024 No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 32 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 32 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. /2024 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, accepts service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No. 2 & 3. Let post admission notice be issued to respondent No. ….2... 1 returnable within eight weeks, on taking steps within three days. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of the learned Tribunal below be also called for. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 18th December, 2025 (raman)