Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37546 (JHR)

GOPAL MISTRY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/674/2025 · 2025-11-21

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34885 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 674 of 2025 1. Gopal Mistry, aged about 43 years, son of Late Nemchand Mistry, R/O-viVlage-Gerwatad, P.O.- Balumath & P.S-Balumath, District-Latehar, Jharkhand, 829202 2. Manish Kumar Singh, aged about 39 years, son of Late Ram Kumar Singh, R/O-Village-Komar, P.O- Balumath & P.S-Balumath District-Latehar, Jharkhand, 829202 3. Subodh Kumar Ganjhu, aged about 30 years, son of Late Indradeo Singh Ganjhu, R/O-Village-Murdhoi, P.O.-Manatu & P.S- Manatu, District-Palamu, Jharkhand, 822123 ..Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2.Nand Kumar Ram, The Circle Officer, Bariyatu, Latehar, P.O& P.S-Latehar, District-Latehar ..Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijayant Verma, Advocate For the O.P.-State : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, S.C(L&C)-I -- 05/21.11.2025 Pursuant to the previous order, the Deputy Commissioner, Latehar is present before this Court through V.C. 2. Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, leaned counsel representing the opposite parties submits that the reasoned order has been passed. 3. After going through the reasoned order, it appears that the order has been complied, though it is not in favour of the petitioners. 4 Accordingly, the instant contempt application stands closed by giving liberty to the petitioners to challenge the reasoned order, if so advised. 5. Personal appearance of Deputy Commissioner, Latehar is dispensed with. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 21st November, 2025 Jk