Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37545 (RAJ)

LAXMAN NEHRA @ AJAY NEHRA S/O SHRI HARI RAM NEHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/575/2025 · 2025-11-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44556] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.575/2025 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6856/2025 Laxman Nehra @ Ajay Nehra S/o Shri Hari Ram Nehra, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Harsawa Bada, Tehsil Fatehpur Shekhawati, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Ramsahai Meena S/o Shri Motiram Meena, R/o Jivan Vihar Colony, Near Riding Polo Club, Bindayaka, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Rameshwari Devi W/o Ramsahai Meena, R/o Jivan Vihar Colony, Near Riding Polo Club, Bindayaka, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Pappu Meena S/o Ramsahai Meena, R/o Jivan Vihar Colony, Near Riding Polo Club, Bindayaka, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla Mr. Paras Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Pushpendra Singh Naruka for Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/11/2025 1. The matter comes up on an application seeking correction in the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.6856/2025. [2025:RJ-JP:44556] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-575/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that Mr. Paras Jain, Adv. appeared as associate counsel along-with Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, Adv. as counsel for the petitioner before this Court when the matter was listed on 30.10.2025 and the misc. petition was disposed of in light of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Learned counsel submits that due to typographical error, the appearance of associate counsel-Mr. Paras Jain has been reflected as counsel for the complainant, in fact he appeared as counsel for the petitioner along-with Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, Adv. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the aforesaid error in the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.6856/2025 be rectified. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents- complainants-Mr.Pushpendra Singh Naruka has no objection. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant misc. application stands allowed. Name of Mr. Paras Jain, Adv. is marked as associate counsel of the petitioners in the order dated 30.10.2025. 6. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 30.10.2025. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/251