Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37543 (AP)

K.S.V.SUBRAHMANYAM, PULLAYYA KALVA STREET, PITHAPURAM v. C.SHYAM KISHOR BABU, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER

CRLA/1388/2009 · 2025-08-10

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010646812009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1388/2009 Between: 1. K.S.V.SUBRAHMANYAM, PULLAYYA KALVA STREET, PITHAPURAM, S/O. SINGARAJU CULTIVATION R/O. PULLAYA KALVA STREET, PITHAPURAM. ...APELLANT AND 1. C SHYAM KISHOR BABU HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER, S/O. SAMUEL BANK EMPLOYEE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, FATHE MAIDAN BRANCH, HYDERABAD. 2. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPODENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow the appeal by setting aside the order passed in C.C.No.1 of 2007 dated 03-07-2009 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Pithapuram, East Godavari District and pass such other order or orders as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLAMP 2146 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner / appellant to file Criminal appeal against order in C.C.No.1 of 2007 dated 03-07-2009 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Pithapuram, East Godavari District and pass such other order or orders as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. T N M RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Appeal No.1388 of 2009 ORDER: Learned counsel for the appellant/complainant submits that according to their instructions, the 1st respondent/accused died. Since these are the proceedings initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the cause in the appeal does not survive and requests to close this appeal. 2. Recording the above submission, this Criminal Appeal is disposed of as cause does not survive. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 11.08.2025 M K K