MANTRI REALTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SUNIL MANTRI REALTY LTD) v. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD
FA/196/2013 · 2025-04-22
Registrar Judl Ii, Shri S R Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37540 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37540 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 17 OF 2014 ALONGWITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 22/04/2025
Adv. Aishwarya Deshmukh i/by Divekar and Co. Present for the Appellant
The above numbered First Appeal is listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for depositing cost of printing charges. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not deposited printing charges.
Likewise, in view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 11 (i) and (ii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non- prosecution in case of default of payment of the costs of printing – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the payment of costs of printing charges, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the costs of printing charges have not been paid within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for
failure to prosecute. As such, the prescribed time for payment of printing charges as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress, as learned Advocate for the Appellant has not taken any steps. In such circumstances, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to deposit cost of printing charges. In turn, the learned advocate for the appellant is
directed to deposit necessary printing charges within 02 weeks without fail. On failure, the First Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court of Registrar. Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-22.04.2025