HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10063 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2, Sri Saurabh Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no. 3, learned standing counsel for respondent nos. 4 & 7 and Sri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 & 6. 2. Sri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 & 6 informed that tender in question has already been given to M/S Jai Maa Vindhvasini Suppliers and work has also been completed. Therefore, relief so prayed by the petitioner may not be granted. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 8, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Dwivedi, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Krishna Agarawal, Saurabh Pandey, Shivendra Kumar Singh (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) M/S Azad Enterprises .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad