Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:32756 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1176 of 2024 ------ Lalmuni Pandey, son of Shri. Ramjee Pandey, resident of Masaurha, P.O. Masaurha, P.S. Nadriganj, District Nawada, Bihar-805109. … … Petitioner Versus
1. State of Jharkhand.
2. Prashant Kumar, Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002.
3. Sanjay Kumar, Joint Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002.
4. Amod Kumar, Deputy Secretary (Management), Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002.
5. Upendra Sinha, Under Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002.
6. Vijay Shankar, Engineer-in-Chief-I, Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002.
7. Mithilesh Kumar, Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Dumka, Mahua Dangal, P.O., P.S. & District Dumka, Jharkhand-814101.
8. Naresh Prasad Mandal, Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar, Jharkhand-814112.
9. Rameshwar Ravidas, Executive Engineer (In-Charge), Minor Irrigation Circle, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar, Jharkhand-814112. … … Opposite Parties ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akchansh Kishore, Advocate For the O.P. (s) : Ms. Rishi Bharati, AC to AAG-III -----
08/ 31.10.2025
Heard the parties.
2.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the order dated 19.06.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No.1354 of 2024, has been complied with by the opposite parties by passing a reasoned order. He submits that the notification has been issued,
2025:JHHC:32756 but he is aggrieved by a portion of the said notification.
3.
Considering the aforesaid submission, this contempt is dropped. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move before the appropriate Forum, if he is aggrieved by the notification.
4.
Interlocutory application being I.A. No.1522 of 2025 for extension of time stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 31st October, 2025 Prashant. Cp-2