Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37531 (RAJ)

HARSH SHRIVASTAVA @ RANU PANDIT S/O SHRI RATAN SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17050/2025 · 2025-12-19

Ravi Chirania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51790] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17050/2025 Harsh Shrivastava @ Ranu Pandit S/o Shri Ratan Shrivastava, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mehandi-Baag, Hanuman Mandir Ke Peeche, Alwar, P.s. Kotwali, District Alwar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner - Harsh Shrivastava @ Ranu Pandit, aged About 21 Years, arrested in connection with FIR No.600/2025, Police Station Kotwali Alwar, District Alwar for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5) & 352 of B.N.S., 2023. 2. The petitioner’s bail application was rejected by the learned trial Court vide order dated 10.12.2025, thereafter the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The bail application of co- accused has already been allowed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that the present case is at par with that of the co-accused and the offences in the present case are triable [2025:RJ-JP:51790] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17050/2025] by Magistrate. Therefore, he prayed that the accused petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, the allegations leveled in the impugned FIR and noting that the offences alleged are triable by Magistrate, but without commenting upon the merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused- petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Harsh Shrivastava @ Ranu Pandit shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.600/2025, Police Station Kotwali Alwar, District Alwar, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse the liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J RAVI KHANDELWAL /682