THE PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMIT JAMBAGI K D TALUK MUDHOL v. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BELAGAVI
WP/103427/2025 · 2025-09-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37530 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37530 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13428 WP No. 103427 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103427 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
THE PRATHAMIKA KRUSHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMIT JAMBAGI K D TALUK: MUDHOL DISTRICT BAGALKOT-587313 REPRESENTED BY CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER LAXMAN RACHAPPA ISARADDI
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA DESAI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BELAGAVI DIVISION BELAGAVI DISTRICT BELAGAVI
2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BAGALKOT DISTRICT BAGALKOT 587313
3. THE MUDHOL TALUKA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE CO OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED MUDHOL REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 587313
4. 5. THE RETURNING OFFICER THE MUDHOL TALUKA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED MUDHOL 587313 VISHWANATH S. UDAGATTI
Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13428 WP No. 103427 of 2025
6. 7. 8. S/O SURESH UDAGATTI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: JUNJARKOPPA, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587113
GIRISH P. LAXANI S/O PANDITAPPA LAXANI, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: YADAHALLI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587113. VITHAL TUMMARAMATTI, S/O HONAPPA TUMMARAMATTI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & MEMBER OF TAPCMS R/O BANTANUR VILLAGE, TAL: MUDHOL;
DIST: BAGALKOT-587113
MANJUNATH ARALAKATTI, S/O TAMMANNAPPA ARALAKATTI, AGE: 38 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: YADAHALLI, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587113. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH B. CHIGARI., AGA FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. K.S. PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. JAGADISH PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R5 R6;
SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH., ADVOCATE FOR R7 AND R8)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 21/05/2025 PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT (JOINT REGISTRAR, DIVISION BELAGAVI) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13428 WP No. 103427 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Impugned Endorsement dated 21.05.2025 passed by 1st respondent(Joint Registrar, Division Belagavi) produced at Annexure-F, in the ends of justice and equity.
b. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24.4.2025 passed by R2 (Deputy Registrar) bearing No. DR/JDJ/RSR/YUVTEE/R-05/2025-26 produced at Annexure-C, in the ends of justice and equity. c. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari and Struck down the amended bye-law, clause No. 46(b) of the bye law of the 3rd respondent Society produced as Annexure-D dated 25.9.2023 in the ends of justice and equity. d. Issue any such other writ or order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice and equity. 2. A memo dated 25.09.2025 has been filed and signed by petitioner and learned counsel for petitioner, which reads as under; Memo for withdrawal
The petitioners submits as under;
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13428 WP No. 103427 of 2025
That the petitioners are not willing to pursue the matter in view of changed circumstances. Hence, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies in the ends of justice and equity. 3. Accepting the said memo and submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In lieu of the withdrawal of the above petition, the interim order granted stands dissolved. The Election Authority is directed to continue the election from the stage it was interrupted by following the necessary procedure. 5. In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending IA's does not survive for consideration. Hence, IA stands disposed of. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0