Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3753 (RAJ)

RONAK MISHRA @ AJJU @ GAJNESH S/O SHRI DINESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/754/2025 · 2025-02-27

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 754/2025 Ronak Mishra @ Ajju @ Gajnesh S/o Shri Dinesh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bharkhari, Police Station Banda, District Banda (Up) (Presently He Is In Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Soni, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.134/2024, registered at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase III, District Bhiwadi, for the offence(s) under Sections 306 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The deceased was already married and thereafter committed suicide on 18.05.2022. There is no evidence to the fact that soon before the death of the deceased, the accused-petitioner abetted or harassed the deceased which resulted into her suicide. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2024 and the charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court and the trial of [2025:RJ-JP:8756] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-754/2025] the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application and contended that in the suicide note left by the deceased, she has clearly stated that the petitioner was harassing her and the petitioner was involved with some other girl, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2024, the charge-sheet has already been produced and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Ronak Mishra @ Ajju @ Gajnesh S/o Shri Dinesh, in connection with FIR No.134/2024, registered at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase III, District Bhiwadi, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /30