Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:32982] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12535/2025 Hariram S/o Shri Bhivaram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Plot No. 54, Shri Ganesh Nagar-C, Khadla Ki Dhani, Bainad, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Chairman/ Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (Jvvnl), Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302005.
3. The Superintendent Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (Jvvnl), Circle Office, Jaipur Rural.
4. The Assistant Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (Jvvnl), Sub-Division, Badpipile, Jaipur.
5. Madhubala Danodiya W/o Prabhudayal, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of 81/a Sindhu Nagar, Murlipura Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ritwick Dave HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 21/08/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that electricity is a basic necessity. It is further submitted that on account of a complaint filed by aunt of the petitioner, electricity connection was disconnected, for which a representation dated 01.08.2025 was filed before the concerned authority by the petitioner via post (Annexure-3), however, same is not considered, till date.
[2025:RJ-JP:32982] (2 of 2) [CW-12535/2025]
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon
judgment of Apex Court reported in 2022(4) Civil Court Cases 507 titled as Dilip (Dead) Through Lrs vs. Satish & Ors. Heard. Issue notices to the respondents. On directions of the Court, notices are accepted by Mr. Ritwick Dave for the respondents. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case and in light of the judgment passed in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to represent the matter in the office of concerned AEN on 28.08.2025 at 11:00 AM and thereafter concerned authority is directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-3), within a period of 15 days, in accordance with law, by way of a speaking order. In light of the above directions, the present petition is
disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/20