Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
■■4 APHC010645602018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 1374 OF 2018 Appeal under Section 100 of CPC, against the Decree and Judgment passed in AS No. 124 of 2015 dated 17.07.2018 on the file of the IX Additional District Judge, Chittoor reversing the Decree and Judgment passed in OS No. 36 of 2012, dated 29.07.2015 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor. Between: K.Poornimal, Deaf and Dumb, wife of T.Lakshmi Narayana Singh, Aged about 38 years. Housewife, Rep. by her mother Kadiyala Drakshayani, W/o. K. Ramachandra, Aged about 51 years Hindu, House wife, R/o. D.No.2-13, Behru Street, B.Palyam Town & Mandal, Chittoor District. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF AND K.Krishnaiah, S/o. V.Perumal, Aged about 73 years, Hindu, R/o. Thagguvaripalle, Bangarupalem Town & Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT
/ lA NO: 1 OF 2ni« Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the respondent his agents, servants men etc., from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the suit schedule 2012 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil property in OS.No.36 of Judge Court, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the Second Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent : - The Court made the following ORDER :
: SRI T.JANARDHAN RAO, ADVOCATE
/ / / THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.1374 of 2018
JUDGMENT: Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing,
learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he had addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) dated 28.07.2025, stating that the appellant intends to withdraw the present appeal and the same is placed on record. The representation made by the
learned counsel for the appellant is recorded.
1.
2. Perused.
3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant,^the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There >- ' shall be no order as to costs. sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR As a stand closed.
//TRUE COPY// SECTIO^f^FICER To,
1. The IX Additional District Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District.
2. The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District.
3. One CC to Sri T.Janardhan Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi
5. Two CD Copies GPC TAC
\ n HIGH COURT DATED: 30/07/2025
ORDER SA NO. 1374 OF 2018 DISMISSING THIS SECOND APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN