Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3752 (AP)

NUNE SUDHAKAR RAO v. THE BRANCH MANAGER/ THE AUTHORISED OFFICER

WP/1202/2025 · 2025-01-20

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010022772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1202 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-9 [3483] Nune Sudhakar Rao ...Petitioner Vs. The Branch Manager/The Authorised Officer, The Union Bank of India, Ongole Main Branch, Prakasam District. ...Respondent ********** Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. Vinodin Ruth Madapalli Advocate for Respondent : -- CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 20th January, 2025 P C : The petitioner states that he has already filed R.A.No.346 of 2024 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, and the matter is pending before the Tribunal. In the meantime, the auction also appears to have been conducted. 2. Since the petitioner is already before the D.R.T, we do not see any reason to invoke extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, keeping in view the ratio of the judgments of the Apex Court in Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh [(2021) 6 2 HCJ & RC,J WP_1202_2025 SCC 771] and PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank [2024 SCC Online SC 528]. 3. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J Vjl