[2025:RJ-JP:42132-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6306/2020 Dr. Mukesh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Ganpat Lal Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. 35, Mayur Vihar Colony, Near Railway Phatak, Jagatpura, Secretary, Mayur Vihar Vikas Samiti, Jagatpura- I, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Commissioner, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 3. The Collector And District Magistrate, Jaipur. 4. Gopal Pura Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Through Its Secretary, A-5, Hari Nagar Lankapuri Mode, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 5. The Commissioner, Jaipur Police Commissionerate, Government Hostel Building, Police Department Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indresh Sharma Mr. Rajesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri Ms. Pallavi Mehta HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 15/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner claiming the following reliefs:- “(i) by an appropriate order or direction, the respondents be directed to remove the encroachment and illegal construction activity are being taking place over the land earmarked for the park / facility / school. [2025:RJ-JP:42132-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-6306/2020] (ii) by an appropriate order or direction, the respondent be directed to initiate the disciplinary action against the officials who are involved not to take action for removal of the illegal encroachment and construction over the land in question. (iii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent be directed that FIR be lodged against the land grabbers who dared to encroachment upon and raising the construction over land under reference meant for park / facility / school.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited submission that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent No. 2-JDA, and that the same may be decided strictly in accordance with law. 3. In light of such submission, the present writ petition is disposed of while giving liberty to the petitioner to move a representation before the respondent no.2-JDA, which shall be considered and decided strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. 4. All pending application(s) stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J DANISH USMANI /21