IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203+112 RSA-3639-1998 (O & M) Date of Decision:03.04.2025 HARCHAND SINGH ...APPELLANT VERSUS GURCHARAN SINGH & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Ankush Singla, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Advocate for respondent No.1. Service of respondent No.2 was ordered to be dispensed with by this Court vide order dated 27.05.2024. SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) CM-3421-C-2025 For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed. Compromise deed dated 20.03.2025 is taken on record as Annexure A-2. CM-3422-C-2025 & RSA-3639-1998 Instant application has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC for disposing off the appeal in the light of the compromise, Annexure A-2. Issue notice of the application to the non-applicant/respondent No.1/plaintiff. Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Advocate accepts notice on his behalf and affirms the compromise between the parties. He states that he does not have any objection, in case, the appeal is disposed off in terms of the compromise. Accordingly as agreed between the parties, appeal is allowed, suit filed by respondent No.1/plaintiff is dismissed and the compromise is made a part of the decree. 03.04.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.04.07 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh