Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37510 (AP)

SMT.K.BHAGYALAKSHMI v. P.KUMAR

CRP/3359/2023 · 2025-07-17

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010646062023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3359/2023 Between: 1. SMT.K.BHAGYALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE JAYARAM, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC.ATTENDER, R/O.D.NO.22-1254, SRINIVAS NAGAR, KONGAREDDYPALLI, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. P KUMAR, S/o.Late Pakeer Nattar, Aged about 56 years, Occ.Business, R/o.D.No.22-1155/1, Kumarnagar Colony, CMT Road, Kongareddypalli, Chittoor Town, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobeg to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition in this Honourable Court against order dated 24.11.2023 in E.P.No.43/2022 in O.S. No.571/2016 on the file of Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor, for the following grounds and among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to enlarge the petitioners/A1 and A3 on bail by suspending the judgment of the learned Special Judge for trial of cases under NDPS Act-cum I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram passed in N.D.P.S Sessions Case No. 31 of 2018 dated 06.12.2023, pending disposal of the appeal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3359 of 2023 ORDER:- 1. The matter was listed on 27.06.2025, there was no representation. Again it was listed on 11.07.2025, there was no representation. Today also there is no representation. 2. In that view of the same, it is clear that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the present revision petition. 3. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 18.07.2025 DR 89 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.3359 of 2023 Date 18.07.2025 DR