- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16852 WP No. 106443 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 106443 OF 2016 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SMT.REKHA D/O. MADIWALAPPA SAVADATTI, AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, R/O: MARKET ROAD, GARAG VILLAGE, TQ AND DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VAIBHAVI INAMADAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DINESH M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICE, SHANTINAGAR, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. N.W.K.R.T.C., GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DISTRICT DHARWAD, R/BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.W.K.R.T.C., BELAGAVI DIST: BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.M.KHANNUR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS ON THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER ON 12.07.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16852 WP No. 106443 of 2016 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: a. “Issue a writ in the direct the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation submitted by petitioner on 12.07.2015 vide Annexure-F. b. Issue any other writ or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Heard Smt. Vaibhavi Inamadar for Sri. D.M. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. M.M. Kannur, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel Smt. Vaibhavi Inamadar submits that the case projected by the petitioner stands negatived by the judgments of the Co-ordinate Benches, which have been affirmed by the Apex Court. 4. Learned counsel Sri. M.M. Kannur accepts the same as a matter of fact. In light of the said circumstance, the petition is liable to be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, and the prayer of the petitioner cannot be granted in view of the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16852 WP No. 106443 of 2016 decisions of the Court. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE AC/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 104