2025:HHC:37081 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No. 909 of 2019 Decided on: 6th November, 2025 ___________________________________________________________ Ramesh Chand & ors. ....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …..Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate, vice Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5. Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral) Mr. Hitesh Bali, Advocate, appearing vice Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate for the petitioners, on Instructions, states that petitioners do not intend to continue with the present proceedings hereinafter 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:37081 ) 2 (statement taken on record). 2. Prayer for withdrawal of instant petition, being innocuous is not opposed by Learned Counsel for the respondents also. 3. Taking into account the prayer made by Learned Counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition, is dismissed as withdrawn, based on the statement, as aforesaid. In aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition as well as all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 6th November, 2025 (mamta)