Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37494 (JHR)

FR JOSEPH MURMU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./657/2024 · 2025-11-28

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:35659 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 657 of 2024 Fr. Joseph Murmu (Incharge St. Joseph School Barmasia), son of Antoni Murmu, resident of village Barwatola, P.O Ghorangi Chandli, P.S. Giridih, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. Petitioner(s) -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. The Commissioner, Santhal Pragana Division, Dumka. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda. 6. The Circle officer, Godda. 7. The Settlement Officer, Santhal Pragana, Dumka. 8. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Godda. 9. The Charge Officer, Tasdik Camp- Gandhigram, Godda. 10. Kushal Murmu son of Bari Murmu 11. Tala Murmu, son of Sido Murmu 12. Saijhala Murmu, son of Sido Murmu 13. Manju Murmu, son of Sido Murmu 14. Baiju Murmu son of Sido Murmu 15. Barish Murmu son of Bara Anupa Murmu 16. Baljun Murmu son of Bara Anupa Murmu 17. Sufal Murmu, son of Bara Anupa Murmu 18. Charan Murmu, son of Bara Anupa Murmu 19. Mukhlal Murmu, son of Lakhiram Murmu. 20. Sufal Murmu, son of Jetha Murmu. 21. Chota Anup Murmu, son of Jetha Murmu. Respondent Nos. 10 to 21 residents of village Bargama, P.S. Pathergama, P.O Barmasia, District- Godda. ... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the State: Ms. Rishi Bhariti, AC to AAG-III ------ 03/28.11.2025: This petition has been filed for restoration of WP(C ) No. 6611 of 2022 to its original file, which has been dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order. The counsel for the petitioner submits that he could not mark this case in the cause listed dated 29.1.2024, thus this writ petition was dismissed. He submits that no sooner he came to the knowledge about the dismissal of this writ petition, he has filed this petition for restoration of WP(C) No. 6611 of 2022 to its original file. He undertakes that he will appear in this case and remove the defect expeditiously, if the same is restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission, I am inclined to allow this restoration petition. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Consequently, the writ petition being WP(C) No. 6611 of 2022 is restored to its original file. List this case as per roster. 28th November, 2025 Anu/-Cp2. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Uploaded on: 01.12.2025