Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010646032018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31017/2018 Between: Dadala Jagga Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31017/2018 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not disposing the appeal filed by the petitioner herein on 13.01.2016 as against the Notice No. A2/33/SA/DWMA/2015 dated 29.08.2015 issued by the 4th respondent whereby temporarily removed the petitioner from service as Technical Assistant as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the appeal filed on 13 1 2016 by the petitioner herein and to pass…”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that this petition is filed against the action of the 2nd respondent in not disposing the appeal filed by the petitioner against the notice issued to the petitioner dated 29.08.2015 by the 4th respondent and consequently, direct the respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal. Learned Standing Counsel would further submit that the appeal is already disposed of on 12.10.2018, cause of action does not survive in this matter and no further orders are required in this matter.
3. Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since, the relief has become infructuous. No order as to Costs.
3
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 02.04.2025 UPS
4
44 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.31017 of 2018
Dated.02.04.2025
UPS