Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3749 (AP)

BADRI RAMALAKSHMAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1189/2025 · 2025-01-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010022882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1189/2025 Between: 1. BADRI RAMALAKSHMAMMA, S/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. FARMER, R/O D.NO.5-127, CINEMA HALL BACK SIDE, KOMAROLU VILLAGE, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. BADRI NAGARJUNA,, S/O RAMANIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, CHENNAKESWAVULLA BADRI RAMA LAKSHMAMMA, R/O D.NO.5- 127, CINEMA HALL BACK SIDE, KOMAROLU VILLAGE, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MARKAPUR SUB- DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, CUMBUM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, CUMBUM POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. CHENNAKESAVULA VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOIUT 38 YEARS, R/O KUNCHUPALLI ROAD, OPPOSITE TO SETTYGARI READYMADE CLOTH SHOP, KRISTHAMSETTYPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. CHENNAKESAVULA ACHAMMA, W/O LATE SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2140B, NEAR ESWARAMMA TEMPLE, THURIMELLA VILLAGE, CUMBUM MANDAL, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No.5 in interfering with civil disputes and peaceful possession and enjoyment of our property admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.53 cents situated in Sy.No.573/2 at Thurimella Village, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District and property admeasuring to an extent of 120 square yards situated at Sy.No.579/3, Thurimella Village, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District (Hereinafter referred to as Property) at the behest of Respondent No.6 and 7 as perse illegal, high-handed, manifestly arbitrary and in violation to Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.” 2. Heard Sri A.S.K.S.Bhargav, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, at the instance of unofficial Respondents, the Police are forcing the Petitioners to withdraw the civil dispute. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere with the civil dispute between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents and to follow due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.01.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1189 of 2025 Dt.10.01.2025 Dinesh