IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 18498/2025 Decided on: 27.11.2025 Duni Chand and others …Petitioners Versus HRTC & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Avnish Mandhotra, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Avnish Mandhotra, learned counsel, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners are seeking applicability of Devinder Singh versus HRTC & Another.2 3. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of their grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case, such 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No.202 of 2024, decided on 30.06.2025. 2 representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 27th November, 2025(yogesh)