Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37488 (AP)

YANABOTHULA SANTOSH KUMAR, KURNOOL CITY v. YANABOTHULA MAMATHA, KADAPA DIST. & 2 OTHRS

CRLRC/1481/2015 · 2025-07-01

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010643702015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1481/2015 Between: 1. YANABOTHULA SANTOSH KUMAR, KURNOOL CITY, S/O AROGYA SWAMY, HINDU, EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.76/111-46-11-1A, GEETHA NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. YANABOTHULA MAMATHA KADAPA DIST 2 OTHRS, W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR, HINDU, AGED 21 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT S.C. COLONY, JAMMALAMADUGU TOWN AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT) 2. YANABOTHULA CHINTU, S/O SANTOSH KUMAR, HINDU, AGED 3 YEARS, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AS GUARDIAN, I.E., BOTH ARE RESIDING AT S.C. COLONY, JAMMALAMADUGU TOWN AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT) 3. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous in as much as the dispute in between the petitioner and respondent Nos.1 and 2 was settled out the of the Court. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as settled out of the Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 02.07.2025 KAS 133 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1481 of 2015 Date:02.07.2025 KAS