WP No. 10294 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 10294 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 11602 OF 2025,WMP NO. 11600 OF 2025 M/s.Crossbridge Trading Private Limited Rep by its Managing Director, S.Philip, No:412 Kurinjipadi Main Road Pathirakottai Panruti Taluk Cuddalore Tamil Nadu-607 102 Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer Panruti Rural Assessment Circle, Old Kumbakonam Road, Panurti-607 106 Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the Impugned Order dated 01- 02-2025 Original order no GSTIN 33AAFCC1538D1Z7/ 2019-20 issued by the respondent and quash the same as illegal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10294 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Prabakaran For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate (t) ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to call for the Impugned Order dated 01-02-2025 Original order no GSTIN 33AAFCC1538D1Z7/ 2019-20 issued by the respondent. 2.Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondent had issued the show cause notice in DRC-01 dated 24.01.2025 to the petitioner. In response, the petitioner filed their reply on 28.01.2025, along with relevant documents. However, without considering the reply in proper perspective, the respondent passed the impugned order on 01.02.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10294 of 2025 4.Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that in the present case, according to the petitioner they field a reply along with necessary documents and the same was not considered by the respondent in proper perspective. In such case, the petitioner can go before the Appellate Authority since they are well within the limitation period. 5.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 6.According to the petitioner they filed reply for the show cause issued by the respondent along with relevant document but the same was not considered in proper perspective. The recourse available for the petitioner is preferring an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present case with liberty to file appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10294 of 2025 7.Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to file appeal before the Appellate Authority. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 25-03-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10294 of 2025 To The State Tax Officer Panruti Rural Assessment Circle, Old Kumbakonam Road, Panurti-607 106 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10294 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 10294 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 11602 OF 2025, WMP NO. 11600 OF 2025 25-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis