Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37478 (RAJ)

UDAY SINGH HARSANA SON OF SHRI RAMNIWAS HARSANA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14849/2025 · 2025-10-14

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14849/2025 Uday Singh Harsana Son Of Shri Ramniwas Harsana, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Nisoora, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institute, Jhalana Doongri Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Nodal Officer (Recruitment Cell) And Joint Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred with following prayer:- (i) By way of writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Nursing Officer giving 30 bonus marks instead of 20 bonus marks on the basis of his two experience certificates dated 01.06.2023 issued by the respondents. 2. Considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are [2025:RJ-JP:42021] (2 of 2) [CW-14849/2025] directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /25