211 TECHNICAL TEACHER PRINCIPAL TTTI EMPLOYEES UNION CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Or 1. 21.09.2000 at the hands of the Technical Teacher’s Training Institute. 2. by this Court in the year 2000. 3. submits that he is not known whether the Union is still interested in pursuing the present petition or not. 4. in view the statement of the lear petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17905 Date of Decision : 31 TECHNICAL TEACHER’S TRAINING PRINCIPAL VERSUS EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. I.S Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Kanwar, Advocate For the respondent No.1. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the award dated 21.09.2000 at the hands of the Technical Teacher’s Training Institute. The operation of the award dated 21.09.2000 had been stayed by this Court in the year 2000. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 that he is not known whether the Union is still interested in pursuing the present petition or not. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that keeping in view the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17905-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 31-07-2025 S TRAINING INSTITUTE THROUGH ITS ........Petitioner VERSUS AND ANR. ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Brijeshwar Singh Kanwar, Advocate al) In the present petition, the challenge is to the award dated 21.09.2000 at the hands of the Technical Teacher’s Training Institute. The operation of the award dated 21.09.2000 had been stayed nsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 that he is not known whether the Union is still interested in pursuing Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that keeping ned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with INSTITUTE THROUGH ITS ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI In the present petition, the challenge is to the award dated The operation of the award dated 21.09.2000 had been stayed nsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 that he is not known whether the Union is still interested in pursuing Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that keeping ned counsel for the petitioner, the present with SAPNA GOYAL 2025.08.01 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17905-2000 (O&M) -2- liberty to the Union to revive the present petition in case, the members of the Union are aggrieved against the award. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the fact noticed hereinabove, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case, the respondent No.1-Union takes any action for the implementation of the award dated 21.09.2000. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. It is made clear that without the permission of this Court, impugned award dated 21.09.2000 will not be executed. 6. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 31-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.08.01 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document