[2025:RJ-JP:40605] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 844/2019 M/s Mishra Brothers, 2181, Dinanath Ji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur Through Proprietor Purushottam Sharma S/o Shri Ramniwas Sharma, Resident Of 2181, Deenanath Ji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Sandeep Verma, Principal Secretary, Phed Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Shri I.d. Khan, Chief Engineer (Hq), Phed Department, 2- Civil Lines, Jaipur 302006 (Rajasthan) 3. Shri R.c. Mishra, The Superintendent Engineer, Phed Department, City Circle-North, Panipech, Jaipur, Currently Posted As Additional Chief Engineer, Phed Department, Region-Ii, Jaipur 4. Smt. Nisha Sharma, Executive Engineer, Phed Department, City Division-Iii, (North), Jaipur 5. Shri Mahesh Gupta, Assistent Engineer, Phed Department, Sub-Division-Iii (North), Jaipur 6. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Phed Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Adv. for Mr. Siddharth Bapna, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG With Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS [2025:RJ-JP:40605] (2 of 3) [CCP-844/2019] Judgment / Order 07/10/2025 ;kph dh vksj ls ,l ch flfoy fjV ihVh'ku 20331@2017 esa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 19-12-2017 dh dfFkr vogsyuk ds laca/k esa ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h gS] fnukad 19-12-2017 dk vkns'k fuEukuqlkj gS %& **Ms. Charu Jain appearing for Mr. J.M. Saxena, AAG, counsel for the respondent-State submitted that indeed vide letter dated 05.12.2017 under the hand of the Chief Engineer (City and NRW), PHED Department the impugned order dated 16.10.2017 passed by the Superintending Engineer, PHED Department City Circle North has been cancelled. Ms. Charu Jain counsel for the respondent submitted that in view of the aforesaid letter dated 05.12.2017 the petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been granted thereunder, the relief as prayed for in the petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous." fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd mijksDr vkns'k ds ek/;e ls ;kph dh ;kfpdk U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj dh x;h Fkh] ijarq foi{khx.k }kjk bl vkns'k dh ikyuk ugha dh x;h gS tcfd fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk }kjk foi{khx.k dh vksj ls mifLFkr gksrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd ;kph dh ;kfpdk fu"Qy gksus ls [kkfjt gqbZ gS] foi{khx.k ds fo:) dksbZ vkns'k ikfjr ugha fd;k x;k gS] vr% voekuuk vFkok vogsyuk dk dksbZ iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA [2025:RJ-JP:40605] (3 of 3) [CCP-844/2019] vkns'k fnukad 19-12-2017 ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd ;kph dh ;kfpdk fu"Qy gksus ls [kkfjt dh x;h gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kph ds i{k esa dksbZ fof'k"B vkns'k ugha gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA foi{khx.k dks tkjh'kqnk voekuuk ;kfpdk ds uksfVl lekIr fd;s tkrs gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /75