M/S PRAKASH STEEL PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER -I AND ORS
WPA/19174/2025 · 2025-08-21
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37466 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37466 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
21.08.2025
Ct. No. 30
S.L. No.5 SM
WPA 19174 of 2025 M/s. Prakash Steel Products Private Limited
Versus Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I & Ors.
Mr. Uddipan Banerjee Mr. Subhra Kanti Samanta
……for the petitioner Mr. Shiv Chandra Prasad
……for the respondent/PF authority
1. The writ application has been preferred challenging order dated 11th December, 2024 passed under Section 7A of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 and the recovery notice dated 4th August, 2025 wherein the authority proposed to recover an amount of Rs. 40,57,388/-.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a document showing that an appeal has been preferred against the order under challenge in the present writ application before the Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal on 01.08.2025.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as the Tribunal is not functioning on regular basis, the petitioner has filed the writ application.
4.
Learned counsel for the EPF authority has placed a copy of the ordersheet wherein it is noted that the petitioner herein did not raise any dispute/objection in respect of the report of inquiry
2 with dues and payment as filed and the hearing was concluded as there was no dispute.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners being aggrieved with the order under challenge have preferred an appeal and pray that the appeal may be heard in due course and pray for interim protection.
6. On hearing the parties, the writ application is
disposed of with the direction that the petitioner shall pursue the appeal preferred before the Tribunal.
7. Pending hearing of the appeal, the order under challenge dated 11th December, 2024 and the recovery notice dated 4th August, 2025 be stayed till disposal of the appeal.
8. Writ application stands disposed of.
9. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand
disposed of consequently.
10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
11. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
[Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]