Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37465 (BOM)

BHIMACHARYA BALACHARYA VARKHEDAKAR v. CHIEF OFFICER MUNCIPAL COMITTEE PNDHARPUR AND ORS

CA/3179/1992 · 2025-01-09

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

206-SA-306-1992.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 306 OF 1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3179 OF 1992 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2004 Bheemacharya Balacharya … Appellants Varakhedakar and Others Vs. Chief Officer, Municipal … Respondent Committee, Pandharpur WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 608 OF 1991 Bheemacharya Balacharya … Appellants Varakhedakar and Others Vs. Executive Officer of … Respondent Vitthal Rukmini Tem. Committee None for the Appellants. Mr. Sarang S.Aradhye a/w. Ms. Gauri Velankar, Mr. Shantanu Gurav and Ms. Shruti Kothavale for the Respondents. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 9th JANUARY 2025 ORDER : 1. Appeal was initially filed in person. Thereafter Advocate has filed appearance on behalf of the appellants. On 14th November 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.01.09 23:10:00 +0200 206-SA-306-1992.docx 2024, second appeal was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the appellants. 2. On 21st November 2024 the second appeal was directed to be added to the weekly final hearing board. 3. On 19th December 2024 when the second appeal was called out none appeared for the appellants. Hence, second appeal was adjourned. 4. Today when the second appeal is called out none appeared for the appellants. Hence, the second appeal was kept back. Even on second call none appears for the appellants. Second appeal is dismissed in default. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2