[2025:RJ-JP:47628] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17967/2025 Jaya Parmar W/o Late Shyam Parmar, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Bada Chouraha, Khamnor, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Utharda, Rajsamand. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Mr. Vishal Kumar on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondents. 2. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents. 3. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the Impugned order dated 22.09.2025 (Annex.1) and Impugned Relieving Order dated 13.11.2025 (Annex.2) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Utharda, Rajsamand. [2025:RJ-JP:47628] (2 of 3) [CW-17967/2025] 4. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring circular dated 14.07.2022 issued by Department of Education (Group 2) submits that as per point No.5 of guidelines, the grievances of petitioner are required to be considered at the time of transfer. He also referred and placed reliance upon order dated 14.10.2025 in appeal No.4362/2025 passed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur on the basis of circular dated 14.07.2022. He also submits that distance between present place and transferred place is 95 kms, and thoroughly inconvenient to her, who is a widow lady. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the writ petition be disposed at this stage as petitioner may submit representation in light of circular dated 14.07.2022. 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of circular dated 14.07.2022 but in case of deviation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. In the meanwhile, impugned order dated 22.09.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:47628] (3 of 3) [CW-17967/2025] 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /335