Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37463 (PNJ)

KANHIYA LAL v. HY.STATE

RSA/3498/1998 · 2025-04-24

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-3498-1998 (O&M) [1] 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3498-1998 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.04.2025 Kanhiya Lal ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. The appellant-plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the orders dated 14.07.1981, 09.12.1981 and 10.09.1985 be declared as null and void. The said suit was dismissed and even appeal filed by the present appellant-plaintiff was also dismissed. 2. A perusal of the paper book would show that there is no stay operating in favour of the appellant. On 03.04.2025, none had appeared on behalf of the appellant and accordingly, fresh notice was issued to the appellant to see as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal or not. 3. None has appeared on behalf of the appellant to inform the Court as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal or not. PAWAN KUMAR 2025.04.25 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RSA-3498-1998 (O&M) [2] 4. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to revive the same in case any cause survives to him. 5. Registry is directed to send a copy of the present order to the appellant at the address given in the memo of parties. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of in view of the abovesaid order. 24.04.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.04.25 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document