$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 98/2025 & CM Appls.19766-67/2025 SCINDIA POTTERIES AND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Divya Verma and Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Advs. versus SCINDIA INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Rohan and Mr. Jai Dogra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 04.04.2025 1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Respondent raises an objection on the maintainability of the present Petition. She submits that the present Petition is not maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file an appropriate Petition in accordance with law. Liberty as sought for is so granted. 3. The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. All pending Applications stand closed. 4. The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J APRIL 4, 2025/r Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:51:02