APHC010640402011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3474/2011 Between: 1. DR.C.MADHAVA RAO, S/O.LAKSHMANA DAS R/O.204, TARA TOWERS, NCB NAIDU COLONY BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA-520010,KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA POCET-14 SECTOR-8, DWARAKA ,NEW DELHI-110077,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. P S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESARCH, FOUNDATION, CHINAOUTPALLI,GANNAVARAM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, -521286,REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL 3. ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL COUNCIL SULTAN BAZAR, HYDERABAD-500095, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in proceeding No.MCI-211(2)(MT-028)/2009-Ethics/61584 dated 3.2.2011 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires unconstitutional and violative of petitioner rights guaranteed under article 14,16 and 19 of the Constitution of India. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 4294 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings issued by the first respondent bearing Proceeding No.MCI-211(2)(MT-028)/2009-Ethics/61584 dated 3.2.2011. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 33080 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V ANIL KUMAR 2. -- 3. -- The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 3474 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 11.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:3474 of 2011 Date : 11.07.2025 SPP