219 M/S DHARAM PAL GUPTA THE PRESIDING OFFICER CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy even after the expiry of 24 years. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy so as to seek an order on merit. 21-04-2025 Sapna Goyal NOTE IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10891 Date of Decision : 21 M/S DHARAM PAL GUPTA VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER ,LABOUR COURT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that he is not in touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy even after the expiry of 24 years. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy so as to seek an order on merit. Ordered accordingly. 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 10891-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21-04-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS LABOUR COURT, PANIPAT & ANR ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) sel for the petitioner submit that he is not in touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy even after the expiry of 24 years. Hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy so as to seek an order on merit. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE : YES NO PANIPAT & ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI sel for the petitioner submit that he is not in touch with the petitioner and does not know as to whether, the petitioner is interested in pursuing the present remedy even after the expiry of 24 years. having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive the same in case, the petitioner is (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.04.22 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document